omg banned yes!
 

1. Your game name.
2. Name of admin who banned you.
3. Reason for banning. (Or your best guess - be honest!!)
4. Anything else you'd like to explain.

1. most of you know me as Ebonic Midget, i play on various other stupid names i come up with at the time
2. dont know
3. best guess - killing people
4. please unban me cause i like south cali servers and i get to own noobs

We can't tell you why you where banned atm, You havent said the name you where useing at the time or your steam id.

my steam id:
0:0:5735920

cant remember my name cause i change it so much
recently my pubname has been
H4xT3hPlanet!!

Alright thats not one of the id's ive banned for hacking. The admin that banned you should list the offence soon and a demo, sure they havent checked the forums who did. If its not in a few days ill check into it.

i think it was sniperK

if the admin doesnt claim the ban and doesnt post a demo of it within 48 hours of your post, your ban will be lifted

i was banned like tuesday night can we make an exception here?????

twas not me, however this does give me an oppurtunity to make a point. It is not always possible to take a demo of a hacker, when i see a hacker my first thought is ban him before he leaves. Especialy with the lower lvl admins who wear there pd tag. If a hacker is in game hacking and they see [pd] sosandso has joined the game chances are they will leave before a ban can be effectively executed. However, if i ban someone, and i do not have a demo of them hacking, they are reinstated. I understand that it is possible for an admin to think someone is hacking and ban them, when really the player just got lucky, or is just very good, and maybe a second or third opinion is needed before banning. However i think that having to take a demo of someone before you ban them is a little silly for an admin. The reason an admin should be chosen is because they are seen as trustworthy. If a player feels that a mistake has been made and they challenge the ban on the forums then the banning admin should definately have to make some sort of statement or response, and a demo is indefinite proof of a hacker, however i dont think it should be required.

i know im #4 in the server get me unbanned!!

The problem is that there are legit players who get banned, and it's generally better to err on the side of letting a few hackers back in so that the innocents don't get punished. Thus I'm in favor of keeping demos as required proof of someone hacking.